About Me

Name: Kempite
Email: LiberalsRlosers@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

FAREWELL PRESIDENT BUSH - THANK YOU FOR SERVING WELL

There remain only a few hours left in the presidency of George W. Bush. For eight years he antpresidentbushdeparts2whitehousebltnfaadgnllhas given us his best. There were some low points but there were fewer than the media and liberals would have you believe. Katrina was a low point but even that, President Bush really can’t take all the blame for himself .
But for liberals, President Bush was there scapegoat. Hurricane Katrina ravaged Mississippi every bit as much as it did Louisiana, yet Mississippi, under the leadership of Republican Governor Haley Barbour, did not encounter the same long duration of recovery or mishandled evacuations that Louisiana did. Mississippi’s local leaders did not decide to park their buses on low lying surfaces as did New Orleans’ Democrat Mayor, Ray Nagin.
 
No, Mississippi’s first line of defense in natural disasters, their local governments, the governments closest to the people, came through and were every bit as prepared as they told the federal government that they were.
 
Not so in New Orleans though. But a liberal bias from the media helped to make Hurricane Katrina President Bush’s fault. Shortly after the events of Hurricane Katrina many left leaning conspiracy theorists also claimed that Hurricane Katrina and a few of its devastating predecessors were the product of Japan where the Japanese government was inventing a new weapon that increased the intensity of tropical storms into category 5 hurricanes and directed them to land masses that they targeted. Many of the same people who made this claim gave blame to George Bush.
 
That should tell you something.anthurricane20katrina20image
 
Although Katrina may not have been Bush’s fault, the recovery effort in Louisiana does get blamed on him and to a degree that is acceptable. But I guess, on the other side of the coin, the successfully rapid recovery in Mississippi warrants some credit for President Bush?
 
Putting aside the blame game of Hurricane Katrina, there are two things that when grading this presidency, bring his average down. The first is his delay in approving the surge that his own Secretary of State urged for a year before he finally accepted it.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
had been advocating for more troops in Iraq. It was a strategy called “clear, hold and build”. It was also the same strategy that Senator John McCain called for.

Clear, hold and build
was successfully used by Col. H.R. McMaster in the Iraqi city of Tal Afar.
 
The strategy called for door to door operations that cleared insurgents from the city along with an ongoing troop presence in each neighborhood that was cleared. Once this was achieved residents felt secure, and U.S. troops were able to begin rebuilding there. Wherever this strategy was conducted, it worked. The resurgents were gone and our continued presence there, prevented them from returning. As a result, citizens no longer lived in fear and life began to flow unimpeded by terror and violence. To carry out clear, hold and build, more troops were required. But increasing the number of troops was not something the administration wanted to advocate for. Although it was required in order to successfully carry out clear, hold, build the administration was afraid of the reaction to such a call. The President flinched in this area.
 
It was one of the few instances where he allowed public perception to make him second guess his policy judgment. After Viet Nam, we should have learned that if you are going to enter into a fight, throw everything you have into it from the onset. Otherwise don’t get into the fight. In the case of Iraq, we held back.
 
Had we went along with the surge from the beginning, we would have avoided the upsurge in violence that led to the waning of support for the war effort.
 
The other area of deep negative impact on this administration was the financial collapse that brought on the current economic crisis.
 
President Bush does not get blamed for causing the collapse, but it happened under his watch and it should not have.
 
The President, through his advisers, should have seen this coming and helped to avoid it. He should have aggressively turned back some of the policies which led to the overextended loan practices which ultimately tied up loans and the markets.
 
Many of the policies that brought us to this point were from Bill Clinton's administration.
 
Clinton‘s National Homeowners Strategy was a financial scheme that promoted insanely low down payments and coerced lenders into giving mortgage loans to first-time buyers with unstable financing and incomes. It was a way to increase home ownership. That is an admirable motive but as usual, the liberal mentality, forced government to do that which it should not have done. Essentially, the Clinton era initiatives that forced government action on private sector interests led to the need for government to take over FannieMae and FreddieMac.
 
This is not to say that private sector greed and bad business practices did not add to the wrong minded government policy, it did, but what happened here is that government solutions to one problem, created another .
 
Now, ironically, the government which helped to create this problem is having to solve it .
 
As for George Bush, this all came to a head under his watch. For that he must be blamed. So we have the recovery effort in Louisiana, delaying the surge in Iraq and not avoiding the economic crises that we are in, all helping to lower the average of this administrations grade. I have two more things to add though. One is immigration. On immigration President Bush was most inept.
 
On this issue his positions were no where near appropriate for the leader of a sovereign nation. antgall_texmex_giThe Presidents refusal to accept that illegal immigrants are participating in illegal conduct that needs to be prosecuted was a horribly blundered policy and it is one that has not helped to solve our border security problem or alleviate the continued problem of illegal immigration.
 
The other issue I hold against President Bush is his administrations inability to articulate their cause in a way that appealed to the people convincingly. The administration had been doing quite well in it’s first two years when the voice of the President came from then White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer. Once Ari Fleischer left and Scott McClellan entered the picture, the White House lost any sway with the press or the public.
 
This President was great with messages when we were in crisis and he had the people's attention, but in between crisis his message was jumbled and unconvincing. That, for this administration, was half of the battle and after Fleischer left they lost it.
 
On the upside President Bush has many, much wrongly maligned, initiatives to help bring his grade up.
 
Their was his “Faith Based Initiative” which allowed government to accept the involvement of religious institutions in helping out. Faith based initiatives were no longer penalized or denied by the federal government because of religion. It was something long over due in America, especially in an America where religion is not to persecuted against.
 
There was "No Child Left Behind”. This policy was one which had universal support except for some extremist fringe players and teachers union.. But not willing to give credit where credit was due, liberals charged that President Bush backed out of his No Child Left Behind policy by under funding it. Truth be told, federal education spending is at record levels so that argument doesn’t swim.
 
There are many other policies such as the Medicare prescription drug benefit, enacted in 2003. It triggered competition between drug companies and wound up costing less than expected. The Bush tax policy is also to his credit. He didn’t ask for lips to read on this issue, he simply created no new taxes and when he did not reduce them he held the line on them. I only wish he could have added drastic spending cuts to that.
 
Another high point in this administration was the appointment of two supreme court justices, one being the chief justice. antaliThe appointments of John Roberts and Sam Alito were remarkably good choices.
 
Neither had any judicial or ant070628_juris_johnrobertsexpersonal blemishes and neither see the role of the judiciary to be one that makes law but rather interprets it. Add to that their relative youthful ages and the Roberts and Alito appointments to the bench will have a profound on our great nation for decades to come.
 
The next greatest achievement of the administration was twofold. It involves The War On Terror and Iraq.
 
 Despite charges that Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism, the two are entwined together as violent threats.
 
Pre-Saddam Hussein Iraq did not send to us the pilots that took nearly 3,000 Americans in one day but it had intentions just as dire. Saddam did not have any tangible links to 9/11 but he did have links to terrorist, including several who dabbled with Al Quaeda and he did continuously break and defy the cease fire agreement that he signed after the first Gulf War.
 
Combine that with the fact that everyone from Bill Clinton and Al Gore to John Kerry and Ted Kennedy swore that Saddam was a threat and you had every reason in the world to eliminate Saddam Hussein.
 
After 9/11 George W. Bush realized that we must eliminate threats before they eliminate us and so he took out the threat known as Saddam Hussein. In doing so not is democracy being brought to the Middle East but the power and richness of freedom is being delivered to a people that have long since forgotten what independence offers.
 
Add to that that you can say what you want, but we no longer have to worry about any threat Saddam intended, and for that I thank the President.
 
I also Thank him for the second part of this War On Terror effort. Under his watch not another single attack occurred on mainland territory since 9/11. Now if you want to blame Katrina on Bush because it happened during his watch you must also credit him for there being no more attacks under his watch. And when you think about, more attacks occurred under Bill Clinton then George Bush, so I thank President Bush for that as well.
 
The final most valuable thing brought to life under President Bush goes back to exactly four years ago.
 
In his inaugural address , after being sworn in for the second time, President Bush stated:
 
America has need of idealism and courage, because we have essential work at home – the unfinished work of American freedom. In a world moving toward liberty, we are determined to show the meaning and promise of liberty.”
 
He went on to articulate a policy that directed the United States to end tyranny in the world as we know it. Now some may have seen that as a declaration of war by him but most read it the right way. He went on to say………
 
We will persistently clarify the choice before every ruler and every nation: The moral choice between oppression, which is always wrong, and freedom, which is eternally right. America will not pretend that jailed dissidents prefer their chains, or that women welcome humiliation and servitude, or that any human being aspires to live at the mercy of bullies.” “All who live in tyranny and hopelessness can know: the United States will not ignore your oppression, or excuse your oppressors. When you stand for your liberty, we will stand with you.:”
 
The speech has since been antbush-2innforgotten by most but it has not been forgotten by me and hopefully President Barack Obama will also remember it..
 
In its entirety, the address presented the essence of what it means to be an American and it captured the most important role that America must play in this world as its current, last remaining superpower. For me it Bush’s second inaugural address was the foundation for our greatest doctrine ever, the doctrine to achieve and true freedom and peace. When you have the time, click here and read the speech.
 
You will be moved and you will understand our place in this world.
 
The bottom line……. President Bush is a good man and was a good President. He will not go down in history ranked along side of Washington or Lincoln nor will he be lumped together with Franklin Pierce or Jimmy Carter. Ultimately, I believe George H.W. Bush warrants a B-.
 
Many on the left will now assault me for giving that grade but I base George Bush’s presidency on the truth of reality not on the lies and distortions that they have spent the last eight years perpetuating and when you add that to the retrospect of history, I believe George W. Bush's name will slowly rise to its proper placement among American presidents.
 
That is something that will take time. As President Bush recently put it, “they’re still debating and writing about how good or bad George Washington was, so I assume the same will happen to me”.

punchline-politics21

Once upon a time, in a village, a man appeared and announced to the villagers...

... that he would buy monkeys for $10 each.

The villagers seeing that there were many monkeys around, went out to the forest, and started catching them. The man bought thousands at $10 and as supply started to diminish, the villagers stopped their effort.

He further announced that he would now buy at $20. This renewed the efforts of the villagers and they started catching monkeys again.

Soon the supply diminished even further and people started going back to their farms.

The offer increased to $25 each and the supply of monkeys became so little that it was an effort to even see a monkey, let alone catch it!

The man now announced that he would buy monkeys at $50! However, since he had to go to the city on some business, his assistant would now buy on behalf of him.

In the absence of the man, the assistant told the villagers. 'Look at all these monkeys in the big cage that the man has collected. I will sell them to you at $35 and when the man returns from the city, you can sell them to him for $50 each.'

The villagers rounded up with all their savings and bought all the monkeys.

Then they never saw the man nor his assistant, only monkeys everywhere!

Now you have a better understanding of how the stock market works.

Submitted by Dick, Williamsport, Md.

Bookmark and Share

RedWhiteBlue.gif picture by kempite

Take the new POLITICS 24/7 Poll

[polldaddy poll=1277750]

RedWhiteBlue.gif picture by kempite

Be Sure To Sign The Petition To

REPEAL THE CONGRESSIONAL PAY HIKE

Sign the Online Petition - Repeal The Automatic Pay Raise That Congress Is Receiving

Pass The Link On To Family, Friends and Co-workers

http://www.gopetition.com/online/24301.html

Bookmark and ShareDigg!

Tags: Bill Clinton   blognetnews.com   politics 24/7   the United States   Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice   politics twenty-four seven   google.com   rsshugger.com   aol.com   the war on terror   urlfan.com   rebuildtheparty.com   overextended loan practices   natural disasters   bnn.com   financial collapse   last day in office   thenextright.com   viet nam   how would you rate president Bush   Ray Nagin   kempite   Trenton   conservative   rightyblogs.cm   bush leaves the white house   John Roberts   political blogs   John Kerry   hold and build   farewell to president bush   U.S. Troops   Hurricane Katrina   The War On Terror and Iraq   blogtoplist.com   free republic.com   wordpress political blogs   Senator John McCain   bloglines.com   border security   Col. H.R. McMaster   the surge   app.com   strategy   inept immigration policy   9/11   anthony del pellegrino   No Child Left Behind   blogged.com   twitter.com   White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer   the War in Iraq   facebook.com   Tal Afar   al gore   Scott Mcclellan   FreddieMac   new jersey elections   Compassionate Conservative   ted kennedy   B-   inaugural address   Bill Clinton's administration   New Jersey   reddit.com   Sam Alito   George H. W. Bush   new jersey voters   war time president   Saddam Hussein   NEW ORLEANS   delicious.com   asbury park press   gretawire.com   the Middle East   Governor Haley Barbour   FannieMae   John Roberts and Sam Alito   National Homeowners Strategy   townhall.com   yahoo.com   politics247. Politics 24-7   President Bush   star ledger   Mississippi   Medicare prescription drug benefit   clear   louisiana   New orleans mayor ray Nagin   Faith Based Initiative   u4prez.com   Japan   mybloglog.com   democrat   immigration   njvoices.com   last day in office for bush   Iraq   voters   bush leaves the presidency  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MORE TAXES……because they’re good for your health

News has it that New York, replacement Governor, David Paterson, is unveiling 127 new items and services that the Empire State will start taxing.

Although the entire list is too long for inclusion in one blog post, I would like to focus on just two items on the list.

Together the taxing of these two items and the logic behind it demonstrates the utter hypocrisy and lack of reasoning behind liberal tax and spend policies.

The two items I am referring to are gym memberships and soda. Not all soda though. Diet soda is not on Democrats hit list. Claiming that regular soda is less healthy than diet soda, Patterson and fellow Democrats believe regular soda is ripe for a tax that penalizes those who dare to purchase it.

NEW YORK GOVERNOR DAVID "tax it for your health" PATERSON

 

After all it is our health and well being which is the government's primary reason for creating such a tax.

Or is it?

If health concerns were their primary reason, as opposed to economic concerns, why then would they also penalize people who attempt to maintain their health by joining a gym?

If health reasons requires the state to tax soda because it is bad for you, what is the health reason that requires the state to tax gym memberships? Are gym memberships more unhealthy than diet soda?

Let's face it folks, Democrats are just hypocrites.

They claim that they will add a tax to one thing because it is bad for you and then in the same announcement state that they will also add a tax to something that is healthy for you.

Mind you, we are just talking about only two of the new taxes that liberals are promoting in New York. There are 125 others, all as hypocritical and as inexcusable as the next. Each one of them however, will be given a reason for taxing by Democrats. They will try to rationalize each one. But who are they kidding?

Maybe themselves.

I guess they could claim that a tax on gym memberships is necessary because of the risk of injury that could be gotten while trying to keep fit. You know, a sprained ankle on the treadmill, a wrist injury while lifting weights, who really knows. But any excuse is a good excuse.

NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR JON "hey, that was my tax idea" CORZINE

This type of hypocrisy and illogic certainly isn't limited to New York. In fact New Jersey set this trend. When Wall Street wizard Jon Corzine came into office a whole herd of new taxes were created. Just like New York with soda, Corzine and the liberal led New Jersey legislature raised taxes on cigarettes because of their unhealthiness and at the same time, created a tax on gym memberships.

Way to go guys. While looking out for our health you also penalize us for trying to be healthy.

While doing that, Corzine's economic brilliance led to a tax on the planting of flowers, shrubbery and trees.

That's one way to help take the garden out of the Garden State.

The bottom line is this.

We need political leaders who have some brains and understand that most of their constituents have brains too. Stop insulting our intelligence by making excuses for doing what is wrong. Don't tell us you won't tax one type of soda and not another because one is healthier than the other and then tax everything else that is healthy for us.

If health was the governments true intention, then they should be creating incentives to join the gym, not a create a penalty for joining one.

We need intelligent leaders who are willing to look for solutions, not create problems.

While Blagojevich tries to sell a U.S. Senate seat in Illinois , others are trying to sell us excuses for making tough economic times even tougher for us .

Rather than cutting the cost of government, they raise the cost of living. And they do so with the rationalization of a fourth grader who tries to explain that they don't have their homework because the dog ate it.

But, just like New Jersey, Democrats in New York will make excuses and some voters will buy those excuses.

But for how much longer?

Pretty soon liberals will be adding a tax to those excuses that voters buy.

Hopefully voters will wise up. Hopefully voters will realize that we can't tax our way out of every hole in a budget or spend ourselves into prosperity. When that realization comes, hopefully we will provide liberals with an excuse for their not winning in elections.

Maybe we can tell them that, like their reasons for taxing different things, we voted against them for health reasons......our economic health.

punchline-politics21

 

Wondering why there is a government bureau which oversees alcohol, tobacco, and firearms, a young man called the regional office of said bureau.

He asked the man who answered the phone "What wine goes best with an M-16?"

The ATF agent did his best to be helpful and replied.....

"That depends. What are you smoking?"

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »